Google
Web         Gaudiya Discussions
Gaudiya Discussions Archive » ACADEMIC, CONTROVERSIAL
Academic views, controversies, liberal views, eclectic discussions and so forth. Also, extended debates may be moved here. May contain discussion on views that a devotee may find objectionable.

On the relevance of Varna Ashrama - Is Varna Ashrama possible or needed in Kali Yuga?



Bhakta David - Sat, 11 Sep 2004 09:09:49 +0530
Hari Bol Prabhus

I am hoping that the vaisnavas will be able to elaborate on the need or lack of need of the Varna Asrama Dharma.

1. How is a prophesied Golden Age possible without such?

2. How can renunciation take place in the Brahmins without the support of the Varnas?

3. Is Asrama weakened without such?

4. Is a Vedic King or figurehead needed?

I am not the expert here but will contribute if others can begin.

Hare Krishna

Bhakta David
Madhava - Sat, 11 Sep 2004 09:22:43 +0530
Let me answer with questions.

1. Where is this age prophesized in the scriptures? Did Caitanya predict such an age to come? Also, was there varnAzrama-dharma during Satya-yuga? (I can answer that for you: No.)

2. Does one need to be a renounced brahmana to engage in Krishna-bhakti?

3. Have the Goswamis recommended in their writings that people outside the varnAzrama-system should start a role-play of Vedic societal roles as a prerequisite for Krishna-bhakti?

4. What good would he do for anyone?
Bhakta David - Sat, 11 Sep 2004 09:37:43 +0530
Haribol Madhava

I argue that a Golden Age is predicted. This is by Swami Narasingha, I believe an off shoot and a follower in the mood of Rupa Goswami, hence Rupanuga Bhava and such states:

The Golden Age Of The Sankirtan Movement

[ A simple link will suffice. No need to copy-paste the whole thing here. Rather, just write here in your own words what you felt was relevant in that, and give us a link. I have made that link now. - Mod. ]

This expresses my open chivalry and sensitivity to others positions.

Hare Krishna

Bhakta David

Madhava - Sat, 11 Sep 2004 16:20:44 +0530
QUOTE (Bhakta David @ Sep 11 2004, 07:07 AM)
I argue that a Golden Age is predicted.

Curious that none of the earlier AcAryas ever wrote of it. Do you have a good explanation for that? Also, are you aware of the degree to which Brahma-vaivarta Purana is authentic/interpolated?
DharmaChakra - Sat, 11 Sep 2004 16:54:33 +0530
QUOTE (Bhakta David @ Sep 10 2004, 11:39 PM)
Hari Bol Prabhus

I am hoping that the vaisnavas will be able to elaborate on the need or lack of need of the Varna Asrama Dharma.

1. How is a prophesied Golden Age possible without such?

2. How can renunciation take place in the Brahmins without the support of the Varnas?

3. Is Asrama weakened without such?

4. Is a Vedic King or figurehead needed?

I am not the expert here but will contribute if others can begin.

Hare Krishna

Bhakta David

Well.. its been tried on ISKCON farms and such, hasn't it? If you can't do it in a microcosm, what would make you think the world would embrace the idea?

Here's the main problem... with a varna ashrama system, everyone wants to be a Brahmin! When we are picking roles, I'm guessing you won't choose Sudra... but see, no matter how advanced your society, how much spiritual progress your group makes, someone still has to scrub the toilets. But since Brahmins have all these great restrictions against this kind of work... I think you get the idea.

Sri Sri Prema-bhakti-chandrika (Narottama dasa Thakura)
Verse 40
trans. by Gadadhara-prana dasa

'I pray that other subject matters or distresses will not be able to touch me as I meditate on Your lotus feet.
From moment to moment, at all times, let me sing Your glories in the way a chaste wife praises the good qualities of her husband.'
babu - Sat, 11 Sep 2004 17:47:26 +0530
QUOTE (Bhakta David @ Sep 11 2004, 03:39 AM)


4. Is a Vedic King or figurehead needed?

Even more than a king, we need a Princess Di.
Bhakta David - Sat, 11 Sep 2004 19:14:05 +0530
Hari Bol

Prabhus

Thank you for your kind input. I agree that there is not much remotely similar in practice now. That is the nature of Kali. I agree that the division in labour appears to reflect smarta brahminism more than the equal vision of a vaisnava.

The subject is still discussed. Even dirty hari's website is based on the model in part.

How wide-spread could Gaudiya Vaishnavism spread without such? My production will be small for the next few days as I need to do other work.

I do not wish to distress others but I can remember that at New Vrndavan they were putting crowns on Kirtananda and Prabhupada murti's. In Varna Ashrama such should have been Ksatriyas. This made some persons uneasy.

Again I do not wish to offend, this reflects actually emotional content of those affected.

All glories to the Vaisnavas!

Bhakta David
Bhakta David - Sat, 11 Sep 2004 20:10:08 +0530
Hari Bol Madhava Prabhu

In the same link this passage is directly given in support. You are not able to accept the verification of this Purana?

QUOTE
Also, are you aware of the degree to which Brahma-vaivarta Purana is authentic/interpolated?


There will be one varna at the end.

Such a blissful condition is then predicted to last ten thousand years.

kaler dasa-sahasrani
madbhaktah samti bhu-tale
ekavarna bhavisyamti
madbhaktesu gatesu ca

"For 10,000 years of Kali-yuga, such devotees of mine will fill the whole planet. After the departure of my devotees there will only be one varna [outcaste]." (Text 59)

Hare Krishna

Bhakta David
Madhava - Sat, 11 Sep 2004 20:51:01 +0530
QUOTE (Bhakta David @ Sep 11 2004, 04:44 PM)
How wide-spread could Gaudiya Vaishnavism spread without such? My production will be small for the next few days as I need to do other work.

Well, I'd rather ask, how far can it spread with it? After all exporting a religion is easier than exporting a culture wholesale. You don't see Christians promoting the traditional societal model of Jesus' times, and they seem to have been able to scatter their thing around pretty good.
Madhava - Sat, 11 Sep 2004 20:51:54 +0530
QUOTE (Bhakta David @ Sep 11 2004, 05:40 PM)
In the same link this passage is directly given in support. You are not able to accept the verification of this Purana?

What would I have to accept? I asked if you were aware of the extent to which the text is interpolated. You can't just grab anything ending -Purana and think of it as absolute evidence.
Jagat - Sat, 11 Sep 2004 20:56:59 +0530
I have been saying for years, and perhaps one day someone will hear: By Varnashram we mean really "congregational community." In other words, basically a society divided into earners and religious professionals. Nothing more complicated than that.

Keshava - Sat, 11 Sep 2004 21:17:42 +0530
Probably you need to be more specific about what you mean by both a Golden Age and Varna Asrama Dharma. IMHO there is always Varna Asrama Dharma, however you probably mean Daivi Varna Asrama Dharma, right? In that case I take your meaning of (Daivi) Varna Asrama Dharma as being in general terms a Krsna consious social system. In which case I would answer that a Golden Age meaning a generally enlightened Global age would certainly need some sort of enlightened social system as it's basis.

QUOTE
2. How can renunciation take place in the Brahmins without the support of the Varnas?


True renunciation is not dependent on support. First we should ask what is the role of renunciation in the Varnas and Asrama system? The simple answer to your question concerning renunciation and support is that in a Varna Asrama based society the Grhastas specifically the Vaisya Grhastas support the society as a whole (just like today everything is supported by economic activity). The Ksatriyas indirectly support due to taxing and spending. Traditionally Sudras are simply provided for, but if they are given money or whatever in return for their service they also can spend it to support other groups.

QUOTE
3. Is Asrama weakened without such?


That depends on what Ashrama you are talking about. All Ashramas but Grhasta have traditionally had an element of renunciation attached to them. Therefore except for Grhasta I would say, yes. The argument can also be made for regulated moderation in Grhasta life also. So in general excessive lifestyle is discouraged in Daivi Varnashrama. If anyone has the right to exhibit an excessive lifestyle it would be the Grhastas, specifically the Ksatriyas, Vaisyas, and Sudras. However even Brahmins who are in the advisers to powerful Ksatriyas and Vaisyas might exhibit an upscale lifestyle.

QUOTE
4. Is a Vedic King or figurehead needed?


The best form of government according to the Vedic tradition is a Benevolent Dictatorship. So, yes, it would seem that this is neccessary. Democracy, Socialism, Communism, are not as compatible with the ideals of Varnashram.
Bhakta David - Sat, 11 Sep 2004 21:22:34 +0530
Hari Bol Prabhus,

Does Babaji mention any of this? Do you see a different inerpreation of said citation(s)?

QUOTE
QUOTE (Bhakta David @ Sep 11 2004, 05:40 PM)
In the same link this passage is directly given in support. You are not able to accept the verification of this Purana? 


What would I have to accept? I asked if you were aware of the extent to which the text is interpolated. You can't just grab anything ending -Purana and think of it as absolute evidence.

It would appear if there was any rennaisance of Gaudiya Vaishnavism then Varna Ashrama Dharma would have to reappear with such. This appears logical. The other perspective is that everyone is going to be out for one's self. This appears to be the case in Kali.

Hare Krishna

Bhakta David
Keshava - Sat, 11 Sep 2004 21:27:48 +0530
QUOTE
Well.. its been tried on ISKCON farms and such, hasn't it?


No, I don't agree. Varnashram is not something that one can try on a farm owned by a religious organization. It is a social system.

QUOTE
If you can't do it in a microcosm, what would make you think the world would embrace the idea?


This is a good point. However in order to have a viable society with even one brahmin, one ksatriya and one vaisya, how many sudras do you have to have?

QUOTE
Here's the main problem... with a varna ashrama system, everyone wants to be a Brahmin! When we are picking roles, I'm guessing you won't choose Sudra... but see, no matter how advanced your society, how much spiritual progress your group makes, someone still has to scrub the toilets. But since Brahmins have all these great restrictions against this kind of work... I think you get the idea.


Actually if people were allowed allowed more sense gratification and freedom from responsibility many would (and do) choose to be sudras. Also it is not that Brahmins cannot be clean. They certainy should clean (their own toilets or whatever). However that would not be the most useful use of their intelligence as a profession.
Bhakta David - Sat, 11 Sep 2004 21:31:31 +0530
Hari Bol Keshava Prabhu

QUOTE
Probably you need to be more specific about what you mean by both a Golden Age and Varna Asrama Dharma. IMHO there is always Varna Asrama Dharma, however you probably mean Daivi Varna Asrama Dharma, right? In that case I take your meaning of (Daivi) Varna Asrama Dharma as being in general terms a Krsna consious social system. In which case I would answer that a Golden Age meaning a generally enlightened Global age would certainly need some sort of enlightened social system as it's basis.


I found your commentary well thought out and presented. Do you know of any sastra predicting the Golden Age?

There is a discussion if such has been interpolated into purports.

Hare Krishna

Bhakta David
Keshava - Sat, 11 Sep 2004 21:35:17 +0530
QUOTE
How wide-spread could Gaudiya Vaishnavism spread without such?


It is not just the lack of social integration that stops Gaudiya Vaisnavism from spreading it is it's very narrow sectarian dogmas and practices.

There is just no way to get masses of people interested in manjari svarupa smarana and sadhanas that take all day to perform.

QUOTE
I do not wish to distress others but I can remember that at New Vrndavan they were putting crowns on Kirtananda and Prabhupada murti's. In Varna Ashrama such should have been Ksatriyas. This made some persons uneasy.


This was due to a basic misconception on the part of Kirtanananda. Which he later changed due to pressure by others and the comments of Narayana Maharaja. As a person who was at the center of this controversy I can relate the entire story if you are interested.
Keshava - Sat, 11 Sep 2004 21:41:55 +0530
QUOTE (Jagat @ Sep 11 2004, 05:26 AM)
I have been saying for years, and perhaps one day someone will hear: By Varnashram we mean really "congregational community." In other words, basically a society divided into earners and religious professionals. Nothing more complicated than that.

Good point. There seems no real point in trying so hard to "re-invent the wheel" socially. As long as one can live relatively freely and practice his religion freely why should one worry about the social framework?

Having said that there will be or should be followers of Vaisnavism who can be in social positions equal to their guna and karma ie workers, business people, administrators and intellectuals. And there will also be those who take up the religious profession fulltime. They will fall into these categories as well.
Bhakta David - Sat, 11 Sep 2004 21:41:55 +0530
Hari Bol Prabhu Keshava

I am interested.

QUOTE
QUOTE 
I do not wish to distress others but I can remember that at New Vrndavan they were putting crowns on Kirtananda and Prabhupada murti's. In Varna Ashrama such should have been Ksatriyas. This made some persons uneasy.



This was due to a basic misconception on the part of Kirtanananda. Which he later changed due to pressure by others and the comments of Narayana Maharaja. As a person who was at the center of this controversy I can relate the entire story if you are interested.


Your Servant

Bhakta David
Keshava - Sat, 11 Sep 2004 21:57:07 +0530
My view is that Kirtanananda felt himself to be like a king of New Vrndavan and therefore he projected this on Srila Prabhupada.

There is an element of kingship in the system of Jeer or Math Swamis in India. Indeed they are even called Maharajas (in North India and in GM/ISKCON). This is essentially not correct. A sannyasin is NOT a king. He should be a renunciate. That is his opulence.

Anyway I was living in India and visiting New Vrndavan each summer to perform pujas for Kirtanananda. When he put the crown on SP, many devotees outside New Vrndavan objected. At the time the GBC had rejected taking advice from Sridhara Swami but were taking advice from Narayana Swami of GM. So Bhaktitirtha Swami (a friend and supporter of Kirtanananda) went to Narayana Swami and told him that the GBC wanted to kick out Kirtanananda for worshiping SP in a "kingly" way. He did not indicate specifically that a crown, sceptre or ermine cape were involved. Since Narayana Swami's English was limited, he did not understand exactly what this entailed. In hindi or sanskrit raja upacara is the common term for the worship of the deity in the temple. It means kingly service.

Later I went to Narayana Swami with Bhanu Swami on behalf of the GBC to ask some other questions. As was the system in those days. I knew him well because I had been SP's samadhi pujari for some years and so I went to ask some questions on behalf of the GBC. He asked us why the GBC wanted to kick out Kirtanananda.

I explained clearly to him about the crown and requested that he see a photograph of it before making any statement. When I returned to ISKCON Mayapur with Bhanu Swami, he related this to the other GBC men. They insisted that Mahabuddhi and Radhanatha Swami go with a picture and show Narayana Swami. They were sworn to secrecy about his reply about this. However it is common knowledge now that Narayana Swami realized that he had been deceived by Bhaktitirtha and immediately denounced the practice.

After hearing this Kirtanananda removed the crown, telling his followers that he had received instructions to do so in a dream.

End of story.
Bhakta David - Sat, 11 Sep 2004 22:09:41 +0530
Hari Bol Prabhus

In a complementary note, bishops in Christian churches are heirs of the Apostles. As such they are princes in peerage to a king. In this regard, they have all the privileges generally given to princes in western monarchy.

This appears to reflect in Kirtanananda's interest in Christianity and the transformation of New Vrndavan to The City of God a la St. Augustine.

Hare Krishna

Bhakta David
Bhakta David - Mon, 13 Sep 2004 02:38:50 +0530
Hari Bol,

I have been listening to a Prabhupada lecture on the subject. 11-2. It is quite generalized but he states that in Kali Yuga society only creates two varnas.

These are vaisyas and sudras. He argues that Varna Ashram is necessary because it changes animal society into civilization.

He gave the example that a street dog is not so nice but when he has a master he becomes nice.

The position demonstrates that the maha mantra is increasingly becoming the only shelter.

Hare Krishna

Bhakta David
Bhakta David - Wed, 15 Sep 2004 10:56:01 +0530
Hari Bol Prabhus

Here is a reference for a "Golden Age".

There is supposed to be a verse in the Brahma-Vaivarta Purana which says:

Text 59 -

kaler dasa-sahasrani madbhaktah samti bhu-tale
ekavarna bhavisyamti madbhaktesu gatesu ca

"For 10,000 years of Kali such devotees of Mine will fill the whole planet. After the departure of My devotees there will be only one varna [outcaste]."

Hare Krishna

Bhakta David
babu - Wed, 15 Sep 2004 18:53:30 +0530
Call me weird but I like the right to vote...even though it may not even mean anything..."If the Gods had wanted us to vote, they would have given us candidates", Jim Hightower. I think the idea of evolution to democratic societies with all people having choice and participation in government is something vital and important. Sorry, no scriptural references... its just a gut feeling.