Discussions on other Vaishnava-sampradayas and Gaudiyas other than the Rupanuga-tradition should go here. This includes for example Madhva, Ramanuja, Nimbarka, Gaura-nagari, Radha-vallabhi and the such.
The sahajiya-tradition - Trying to understand this sahajiya business
ananga - Thu, 06 May 2004 22:49:33 +0530
I am interested how sahajiya is understood within non GM/ISKCON raganuga bhaktas. In a bengali village I once saw a baul "performance" where the tears seemed to be contrived; a million miles away from the kind of crying I've seen and done myself in bengali nam jagya kirtan. Although sometimes in nam jagya I thought there was an element of "fake it till you make it" which GM/ISKCON would definitely describe as as sahajiya.
So then, what do you understand by sahajiya?
Madhava - Fri, 07 May 2004 00:05:30 +0530
There are quite a few topics discussing the concept of sahajiyA. Essentially, sahajiyA-vAda is a doctrine originally derived from outside the gauDIya-tradition, where the sAdhakas essentially perceive themselves as the microcosmic embodiments of the divine and attempt to attain unity with the divine through tantric sAdhana involving sexual intercourse among other things.
Whether those kirtanIyas were sahajiyA or not cannot be judged by the quantity of their tears. It is a matter of their beliefs. Certainly trying to artificially shed tears is not the proper standard for a gauDIya-sAdhaka, but that alone does not a sahajiyA make. Perhaps the sahajiyA also practice shedding tears, that I do not know.
nabadip - Fri, 07 May 2004 01:25:46 +0530
QUOTE
Although sometimes in nam jagya I thought there was an element of "fake it till you make it" which GM/ISKCON would definitely describe as as sahajiya.
In GM devotional feelings are denied, rejected. So if a bhakta shows feelings he is a sahajiya. Simple as that.
Indradyumna das - Tue, 11 May 2004 23:34:14 +0530
QUOTE
Although sometimes in nam jagya I thought there was an element of "fake it till you make it" which GM/ISKCON would definitely describe as as sahajiya.
So then, what do you understand by sahajiya?
Q u e s t i o n. I would like to know how to distinguish between a sahajiya and a rasika bhakta?
A n s w e r. In the mind of Bhaktisiddhanta Saraswati Thakura, a sahajiya is one who takes the esoteric lilas of Krsna cheaply, thinking that he can taste them while still grounded in material desire. Saraswati Thakura preached that one must pass through many stages before tasting rasa in Krsna lila. Caitanya Caritamrita states that the abode of Krsna is not constituted of material elements. It is 'sakala cinmaya'. Thus, if one is to go there and taste rasa, he or she must become cinmaya as well. Just as if one desires to live on the sun, one must become fire to do so. Similarly we must first become free from material contamination and become purely spiritual in order to actually taste rasa. One who can taste rasa is a rasika. Only such persons can fully relish Srimad Bhagavatam, 'muhur aho rasika bhuvi bhavukah'
(
http://www.swami.org/sanga/archives/pages/vnn/ET03-4217.html )
---
The Sahajiya doctrine holds that Radha and Krsna are the macrocosmic representation of the microcosmic union of man and woman and through sexual encounter imitates the 'myth' of Radha-Krsna (man thinking himself to be Krsna and his unwedded partner to be Radha). Through this, one can realize himself to be the spiritual essence arising out of the combination of the male and female principles. Gaudiya Vaisnavism on the other hand does not admit to this macrocosmic/microcosmic concept, nor that it culminates in an impersonal spiritual essence in which man and woman are thought to have become one through sexual union.
(
http://www.swami.org/sanga/archives/pages/...three/m140.html )
---
Q. What and to whom was Bhaktisiddhanta Saraswati Thakura referring with the term "prakrta sahajiya"?
A. Prakrta sahajiyas are a particular sect of pseudo-Vaisnavas who envision Radha and Krsna as the archetype for man and woman. Thus they try to imitate them and conclude on the basis of a complex theology that spiritual perfection can be achieved by such imitation, which may include sexual acts. Prakrta sahajiyas believe they can imitate Radha and Krsna in the flesh. That is the reason why the name prakrta (material) has been given to them by orthodox Gaudiya Vaisnavas, whereas they refer to their sect as Sahaja Vaisnavas. Sahaja means natural or easy. The ideal of this sect is monistic.
The great Bhaktisiddhanta Saraswati Thakura used the term sahajiya to refer to all those whose practice of Vaisnavism was tinged with a material conception of life. He also used this term to refer to those who took cheaply the exalted ideal of rasananda, and the conjugal love of Radha-Krsna in particular, and, although lacking eligibility, attempted to enter the raga-marga by imitating the bhajana of advanced souls.
(
http://www.swami.org/sanga/archives/pages/..._five/m226.html )
Madhava - Wed, 04 Aug 2004 03:22:05 +0530
Let's bring this one back up again. Does anyone have any good links describing the philosophy and history of the sahajiya-tradition? I'd like to make this one the definitive thread on sahajiyaism, since I noticed we didn't have one as of yet that I could link people up with.
Here's a summary article from Banglapedia:
Sahajiya - A religious cult. I recall Jagat mentioning some things were a bit odd there, so read with a grain of salt.
Posted by Bangli:
Longing in Sahajiya - Indecent Practices and Erotic Trance: Making Sense of Tantra
gopidust - Wed, 04 Aug 2004 19:15:41 +0530
After reading this i can only conclude that i am a sahajiya.
Kishalaya - Wed, 04 Aug 2004 20:20:27 +0530
QUOTE (gopidust @ Aug 4 2004, 07:15 PM) |
After reading this i can only conclude that i am a sahajiya. |
subhashya sheeghram
All your posts are nothing but a fight against yourself. Since I have done that, I know how it goes. Don't worry, your heart will win, not your head
--
sorry if this is a bit offtopic, but I could not control myself
gopidust - Wed, 04 Aug 2004 21:12:16 +0530
No offense but I am in a room full of various sorts of devotees who all are like the characters in the wizard of oz looking for various things and we all want something the philosophy says we cannot have so how are any of us going to definitavely prove we are allowed to have it?
I have material and spiritual desires but how do I know my spiritual desires are real it seems to be based on my material desires anyway? I am a lesbian in this life and I want to be a manjari in my next so I can become one of the most beautiful women imaginable and serve other unimaginably beautiful young girls eternally.
Kalkidas - Wed, 04 Aug 2004 21:26:09 +0530
QUOTE (gopidust @ Aug 4 2004, 03:42 PM) |
I have material and spiritual desires but how do I know my spiritual desires are real it seems to be based on my material desires anyway? I am a lesbian in this life and I want to be a manjari in my next so I can become one of the most beautiful women imaginable and serve other unimaginably beautiful young girls eternally. |
I see answer in Sri Rupa Gosvamipada's Bhakti-rasamrta-sindhu (1.2.274-275), where he cites the Seventh Canto of Srimad Bhagavata Purana:
As in the Seventh Canto (7.1.29-30):
"By absorbing their minds in the Lord due to lust, envy, fear, affection and devotion, many gave up sin and attained their goal; the gopis with lust, Kamsa with fear, the kings headed by Caidya (Sisupala) with envy, the Vrishnis with their relationship, you (Yudhisthira and others) with affection and we with devotion, O great one."
Kishalaya - Wed, 04 Aug 2004 21:35:25 +0530
QUOTE |
how are any of us going to definitavely prove we are allowed to have it?
|
There is something called prayer. But you can only pray to the one who is the closest to your heart, which may end up you getting even closer to the one you pray
tesam satata yuktanam bhajatam priti purvakam
dadami buddhi yogam tam yena mam upayanti te
gopidust - Wed, 04 Aug 2004 21:35:53 +0530
Yes Kalkidas it is quotations like that that keep me going on with my philosophy. If only a GURU would say I am right in my understanding! It is right there in Srila Prabhupada's books! But then we hear not to join the gopibhava club.
Ok Kishalaya you are my guru. I will pray to Radharani. It makes sense to me. Thank you thank you thank you! I give up!
Rasaraja dasa - Wed, 04 Aug 2004 21:40:59 +0530
QUOTE (gopidust @ Aug 4 2004, 08:05 AM) |
Yes Kalkidas it is quotations like that that keep me going on with my philosophy. If only a GURU would say I am right in my understanding! It is right there in Srila Prabhupada's books! But then we hear not to join the gopibhava club. |
Dear Gopidust,
Dandavats. All glories to the Vaisnavas.
If one is truly a faithful follower of Srila Prabhupada and Srila Bhaktisiddhanta Maharaja, then one should not associate with the "babajis" or more specifically with any Vaisnava group outside of ACBSP and BSST. I believe it is rather clear in ACBSP's books how we envisions his followers are to develop themselves in their spiritual lives and that he does not want his followers in such asscoiation. In his view such association, devotees and contemplations were immature and harmful. So if your faith is so strong in ACBSP view, which is of course his opinion, than no need to fight yourself here because ACBSP wouldn't want you here.
However if you appreciate and honor ACBSP but do not have firm faith in every decision he made, word he spoke or philosophy he preached than you should spend time understanding what each group and teacher has to offer in terms of philosophical presentations, practice and mood.
Aspiring to serve the Vaisnavas,
Rasaraja dasa
Kishalaya - Wed, 04 Aug 2004 21:41:34 +0530
QUOTE |
Ok Kishalaya you are my guru.
|
Actually this came from a saadhu! I am ever indebted to that person!
--
Er! sorry for the preaching
Madhava - Wed, 04 Aug 2004 22:48:51 +0530
QUOTE (Rasaraja dasa @ Aug 4 2004, 04:10 PM) |
If one is truly a faithful follower of Srila Prabhupada and Srila Bhaktisiddhanta Maharaja, then one should not associate with the "babajis" or more specifically with any Vaisnava group outside of ACBSP and BSST. |
I agree, as far as ACBS goes, but have you ever read statements condemning "outside association" (as in "other than his own followers") from BSST?
Rasaraja dasa - Wed, 04 Aug 2004 23:11:23 +0530
QUOTE (Madhava @ Aug 4 2004, 09:18 AM) |
QUOTE (Rasaraja dasa @ Aug 4 2004, 04:10 PM) | If one is truly a faithful follower of Srila Prabhupada and Srila Bhaktisiddhanta Maharaja, then one should not associate with the "babajis" or more specifically with any Vaisnava group outside of ACBSP and BSST. |
I agree, as far as ACBS goes, but have you ever read statements condemning "outside association" (as in "other than his own followers") from BSST?
|
Dandavats. All glories to the Vaisnavas.
In general the statement of not going outside of BSST's circle was given by BSST's disciples although I seem to remember quotes and references in some of BSST's disciples writings were BSST specifically said this. I will have to dig through boxes in my garage when I return next week to see what I can find.
I was speaking more to ACBSP statement that his followers were not to go outside. At times he stated they were no even to go to his Godbrothers but at other times he allowed their association but never allowed anyone outside of that.
Aspiring to serve the Vaisnavas,
Rasaraja dasa
gopidust - Thu, 05 Aug 2004 01:13:04 +0530
There is no problem here. Srila Prabhupada said we can pray to Radharani if we like if we are lesbians. At least that is what I was told. Can anyone confirm this? And gay men can devote themselves to Krishna.
His father Gour Mohan De invited lots of sadhus every day for prasadam and asked each one of them to give his son the benediction of becoming a devotee of Radharani?
The problem is we don't know who is advanced and who is not so when ISKCON devotees go to holy places we have to go in association of other ISKCON devotees to make sure we meet with other devotees at the holy places there.
betal_nut - Thu, 05 Aug 2004 02:28:22 +0530
Lesbians can devote their hearts to Radharani and gay men can devote their hearts to Krishna.
Seems like us straight females are the ones to lose out because we are not supposed to covet Krishna but remain satisfied in a kind of voyeuristic pleasure via osmosis. Nor do we even get to "enjoy" our husbands in Goloka Vrindavan.
gopidust - Thu, 05 Aug 2004 06:18:28 +0530
Betal I don't know what to tell you I had a hard enough time just trying to figure out my own situation. Are you more attracted to Krishna or to Radharani? It seems you like Krishna better. So you don't have a problem. Just chant Hare Krishna and become his servant or whatever.
betal_nut - Thu, 05 Aug 2004 07:20:33 +0530
Maybe I should jump on over to your camp, Gopi.
Perumal - Thu, 05 Aug 2004 08:11:02 +0530
QUOTE (Madhava @ Aug 4 2004, 05:18 PM) |
QUOTE (Rasaraja dasa @ Aug 4 2004, 04:10 PM) | If one is truly a faithful follower of Srila Prabhupada and Srila Bhaktisiddhanta Maharaja, then one should not associate with the "babajis" or more specifically with any Vaisnava group outside of ACBSP and BSST. |
I agree, as far as ACBS goes, but have you ever read statements condemning "outside association" (as in "other than his own followers") from BSST?
|
Maybe I should dig up some photos of Srila Govinda Maharaj sitting with his friend Nirmalchandra Goswami of RadhaDamodar Mandir, or of him with other friends of his such as Krishna Vallabha Vrajabasi of the Syamananda family at Seva Kunja. Sri Nirmal Chandra Goswami and Krishna Vallabha Prabhu organized for Srila Sridhar Maharaj's successor Srila Govinda Maharaj to be able to purchase the land next to RadhaDamodara temple and install the puspa samadhi and Deity of Srila Sridhar Maharaj there. You can see the domes of this temple of Srila Sridhar Maharaj in one of the the photos on this page
http://www.radhadamodarmandir.com/six-gosw...dhama-seva.htmlAlso, in the blurb on that page it says that Narasingha Maharaj of Mysore is spending some money for new construction work at RadhaDamodara. Sri Nirmal Chandra Goswami also arranged for Srila Govinda Maharaj to purchase the land where Srila Krishnadas Kaviraj lived in Seva Kunja, and where he wrote some of Chaitanya Charitamrta. Krishna Ballabha is the father of Mahesh, the cloth merchant in Loi Bazaar, which is just around the corner. Most western devotees know Mahesh. The only people we are advised not to associate with are people who abuse our Guru-varga.
Rasaraja dasa - Thu, 05 Aug 2004 10:09:01 +0530
QUOTE (Perumal @ Aug 4 2004, 06:41 PM) |
The only people we are advised not to associate with are people who abuse our Guru-varga. |
Dandavats. All glories to the Vaisnavas.
I was always under the impression that Srila Govinda Maharaja did not wish for his disciples to associate with or take spiritual instruction from anyone outside of Srila Bhaktisiddhanta's parampara. It is interseting to hear that he would have no objection for one of his disciples and/or followers to take instruction from someone such as Ananta dasa Babaji since Baba doesn't concern himself with discussing or abusing Maharaja's Guru-varga.
Personally I have many of Govinda Maharaja's books and publications as well as all of those of his Guru Maharaja. Srila Govinda Maharaja and his Guru Maharaja have always done, in my opinion, a terrific job at encouraging his disciples to be very "family" oriented and having temples and centers that welcome all Aspiring Vaisnavas. I am very fond on many of his great disciples and followers in San Jose and Santa Cruz. They have always been extremely kind to my family and I and were instrumental in helping me find a devotee that could help me secure Gaura Nitai deities for Satsvarupa Maharaja.
I hope Maharaja's health is continueing to improve as I would love to bring my children to one of his darsanas if he ever returns to California. My youngest son always enjoys looking at Maharaja's website and asks to see pictures of Maharaja.
All glories to the Vaisnavas,
Rasaraja dasa
Tamal Baran das - Thu, 05 Aug 2004 11:29:07 +0530
My wife and myself have a long history with Sri Sri Radha Damodar temple.We got married there by official Vedic marriage by sons of Sri Nirmal Chandra Goswamiji and he himself was a master of ceremony.Sri Nirmal Chandra Goswami accepted us into his family, and every time we come in Vraj, we always visit the temple and his family. They are very special and very kind brijbasis and devotees.
The day before i got married i have arrived and spent 2 days living in quarters in a temple where some sadhus did live before, my wife was separated from me in different quarters of the temple. I remember goswamis family coming and practically bathing me in turmeric.The whole marriage ceremony was beautiful. I remember that i went on the street, when it was prasad time, to call other brijbasis to come and take prasad. Some really interesting faces did show up, like two Shivaite tantrik sadhus, which were looking at me like they will cast a spell, so i did serve them constantly to get their mercy. I was chanting at the samadhis almost whole night before marriage by myself, and in the morning in Bhaktivedanta Swamiji quarters. Sri Nirmal Chandra Goswamiji told me at that time, (that was years ago) that he did ask Iskcon to help him renovate all this surrounding area, which is being/is renovated now, and they didn't care and were not at all interested. Then he said: somebody will come who values this place, and he did mention Sri Krishna Caitanya Saraswata Matha.
It is nice to see that area is developing, and although i don't want to comment on Sri Narasingha Chaitanya Matha philosophically and in any other way... i know that they will also do a very good job restoring other quarters in that area.
B. G.Narasingha Maharaja has penchant for building and developing sites for Deities and Devotees.
Perumal - Fri, 06 Aug 2004 05:38:15 +0530
QUOTE (Rasaraja dasa @ Aug 5 2004, 04:39 AM) |
I hope Maharaja's health is continueing to improve as I would love to bring my children to one of his darsanas if he ever returns to California. |
Srila Gurudeva will probably be going to California next month - September 2004
In regard to taking instruction from others, that is a very complex issue. The way I have heard it is that you should seek to follow the guidance of the higher class of Vaishnavas. But who is higher and who is lower is of course a matter of subjective understanding. Sukadeva spoke the Bhagavata philosophy and Vyasa and Narada listened; when in fact Vyasa was the (siksa) guru of Sukadeva.
In practice, while we are encouraged to seek higher guidance and to respect all the Vaishnavas we meet, Srila Sridhar Maharaj told me to be sceptical about what we hear from people other than our own Guru. Even, I might say, there is one Vaishnava Guru from another line who I respect but still I don't believe the things he says. If some Vaishnava teaches things that are against what I heard from my own Guru then as a faithful disciple I will not take guidance from that person. Then again, if you leave your Guru because you feel another devotee is giving a higher understanding - leaving your previous Guru's system of thought completely - then you have found a new Guru and departed from the previous Guru.
Another peculiar thing that I have seen is that sometimes when a disciple leaves their Guru and goes to a person who they believe is a higher Guru, the disciple may just be a stupid person making a foolish and bad decision to leave the Sad Guru and go elsewhere.
Talasiga - Sun, 08 Aug 2004 10:51:21 +0530
QUOTE (Perumal @ Aug 6 2004, 12:08 AM) |
.............
Another peculiar thing that I have seen is that sometimes when a disciple leaves their Guru and goes to a person who they believe is a higher Guru, the disciple may just be a stupid person making a foolish and bad decision to leave the Sad Guru and go elsewhere. |
A "stupid person" leaving a worthy Guru
may be a very
good decision. Charitable also!