Google
Web         Gaudiya Discussions
Gaudiya Discussions Archive » COMMUNITY, MODERATION AND FEEDBACK
Growth of the online community, standards of moderation, feedback on both the content and the technicalities of the site, related announcements.

questioning talasiga - questions to and about talasiga



Talasiga - Sat, 26 Jun 2004 08:55:06 +0530
QUOTE(Madhava)
I would like to say, and I honestly mean it, that there is something fundamentally screwed up if people spend more time complaining and delving on themselves than they spend in making truly positive contributions that they feel will be fulfilling to the entire audience, not only to themselves.

an excerpt from the last post in this Moderation and Feedback topic


Oh, all right then.
Talasiga - Sun, 27 Jun 2004 16:00:23 +0530
QUOTE(Jagat @ Jun 25 2004, 09:04 PM)
Talasiga's arrival on board Gaudiya Discussions reminded me of another friend with whom I have lost touch.

"Hers" (Peter Valaya) has disappeared from the forum scene. He was a deeply suffering soul, but one with a great deal of insight into bhakti. If anyone should be able to find him, it's me, but I confess I haven't looked.

He was often suicidal. His body was racked with chronic pain from a motorcycle accident. His mind was half ruined by psychedelics. On top of that, he was an ex-career soldier who could be a real son-of-a-bitch.
........

excerpt from this other topic


And just what is the parity between me and Peter? ohmy.gif

I am not suicidal and have never taken psychedelics.
Jagat - Sun, 27 Jun 2004 16:50:13 +0530
The three of us were
talking by the curb
when the garbage truck drove by.

*****

Finding a friend
lost and missed so long
reminds us of those not found.
Talasiga - Thu, 22 Jul 2004 20:17:10 +0530
I just did the Belief-O-Matic test and this is my result:-

QUOTE
Your Results:
The top score on the list below represents the faith that Belief-O-Matic, in its less than infinite wisdom, thinks most closely matches your beliefs. However, even a score of 100% does not mean that your views are all shared by this faith, or vice versa.

Belief-O-Matic then lists another 26 faiths in order of how much they have in common with your professed beliefs. The higher a faith appears on this list, the more closely it aligns with your thinking.

........................


1.  Mainline to Liberal Christian Protestants (100%) 
2.  Bahá'í Faith (96%) 
3.  Unitarian Universalism (95%) 
4.  Liberal Quakers (93%) 
5.  Neo-Pagan (81%) 
6.  Christian Science (Church of Christ, Scientist) (76%) 
7.  Mahayana Buddhism (75%) 
8.  Taoism (73%) 
9.  Orthodox Quaker (72%) 
10.  New Age (71%) 
11.  Church of Jesus Christ of Latter-Day Saints (Mormons) (68%) 
12.  Theravada Buddhism (68%) 
13.  Jainism (65%) 
14.  Sikhism (64%) 
15.  Hinduism (63%) 
16.  New Thought (63%) 
17.  Reform Judaism (62%) 
18.  Secular Humanism (62%) 
19.  Scientology (50%) 
20.  Mainline to Conservative Christian/Protestant (49%) 
21.  Jehovah's Witness (38%) 
22.  Orthodox Judaism (37%) 
23.  Nontheist (36%) 
24.  Seventh Day Adventist (35%) 
25.  Eastern Orthodox (32%) 
26.  Roman Catholic (32%) 
27.  Islam (29%) 



laugh.gif

I hope I don;t get kicked off this forum.
Please note - I have never attended any Protestant school in Bengal
(or anywhere else for that matter)
innocent.gif
Kishalaya - Thu, 22 Jul 2004 20:54:20 +0530
Talasiga ji,

In your opinion, is it possible to entirely separate the emotional from the intellectual, particularly in the context of spiritual endeavour? Till what point should one be able to relate to another whose belief system (otherwise non-disruptive) militates strongly against some long cherished spiritual goal.

I know what is written in the "books", but I am curious for an answer from an enigmatic but clearly experienced personality like yourself.

Regards,
Kishalaya
Talasiga - Sun, 25 Jul 2004 08:31:03 +0530
QUOTE (Kishalaya @ Jul 22 2004, 03:24 PM)
Talasiga ji,

In your opinion, is it possible to entirely separate the emotional from the intellectual, particularly in the context of spiritual endeavour? ..........

My personal approach with probing questions in general, whether posed by me or by others, is to query the question itself. I have mostly found this approach
serendipitous.

In relation to your question, I would need to ask you, "And who is the separator?"

However, as this is not a question ABOUT me but TO me, I would prefer if you started a different topic for this as this topic is more for personal background information about me - biographical info (i.e. factual and relatively unchanging info. whereas my opinions and responses change and develop over time).

Why not put this question of yours in the Q and A forum?
Then others may join in also with their comments.

Kind Regards.
Kishalaya - Sun, 25 Jul 2004 13:25:27 +0530
I apologize if you found the question uncomfortable. However my mind usually hovers around tricky issues! wink.gif

QUOTE

However, as this is not a question ABOUT me but TO me


That was a question aimed at gaining some familiarity with your ideas. But anyway, I guess there are some limits!

QUOTE

In relation to your question, I would need to ask you, "And who is the separator?"


That definitely reveals something about you! smile.gif

With warm regards,
Kishalaya

PS: My last post in your thread!
Talasiga - Sun, 25 Jul 2004 14:45:21 +0530
QUOTE (Kishalaya @ Jul 25 2004, 07:55 AM)
I apologize if you found the question uncomfortable. However my mind usually hovers around tricky issues!
...........


Not at all Kishalya.
You appear to have completely missed the point in my preceding post here.
I hope you will be able to understand me better in the topic I have started for you in the Q and A forum
here.
Talasiga - Wed, 11 Aug 2004 18:06:15 +0530
I am asked why I do not consider myself a Gaudiya or aspiring Gaudiya.
Here are some reasons which may seem to some of you as misguided.
I would be pleased to receive any comments in the interests of my dialectical growth.


REASON 1:-
I cannot see the need, nor have I the desire, to classify Chitra Sakhi as Shakti.

Jagat - Thu, 12 Aug 2004 21:58:44 +0530
Seems a trivial consideration on which to hinge one's acceptance or rejection of anything. Clearly a veiled criticism of those who do proclaim to be Gaudiya Vaishnavas--but a shallow one, indeed.

One who says, "I am a Gaudiya" is one who aspires to the following:

Who is a Gaudiya Vaishnava?

bAhire se AlA bholA antare hRdaya galA
mukhe sadA kRSNa bolA cokhe azru mAlA
dInatAya se mATir mAnuS niSThAte acalA
kRSNa dite kRSNa nite dhare zakti sob
alaukika lokavat gauDIya vaiSNob

He looks artless, guileless,
but inside his heart is melting;
the name of Krishna is always on his tongue
a garland of tears in his eyes.
In humility he places himself below everyone,
yet his faith is unswerving as a mountain.

To give or take Krishna,
is the power in his hands.
He looks just like anyone,
but he is beyond the world.
That is a Gaudiya Vaishnava.

sabAra nIce paRe thAke sabAike se sevya dekhe
sabAra iSTa miSTa bhAkhe kRSNa tattva jńAne
sabAi debA sabAr sevA kRSNa adhiSThAne
nikhila bheda samanvayera mUrti savaibhava
tomAra preme goRA se gauDIya vaiSNava

He humbly takes the lowest place,
sees everyone as someone to serve;
to all he speaks what is pleasing and sweet,
connected to the truth of Krishna;
he knows that Krishna dwells in every soul
and so he gives to all, and serves all.

All contradictions are resolved in him,
this is the glory he incarnates.
Shaped through and through by Your love--
that is a Gaudiya Vaishnava.

sarvottama sadainya vinaya nirahaM suzAnti nilaya
nitAi graha grasta hRdaya sadaya vizva jIve
tomAra icchAya cale bale tomAra icchAya seve
tomAra gaNa sange se pAya prema rasArNava
tomAra sRSTa hRSTa iSTa gauDIya vaiSNava

He is the best of all, yet he makes no claims.
He is without ego, the house of blissful peace.
He is under the astral influence of Nitai,
and so merciful to all souls in the universe.
He walks and talks according to Your desire,
according to Your desire, he serves.

When in the company of those who are Yours,
he finds an ocean of relish.
Your personal creation, Your own ecstatic object of worship --
that is a Gaudiya Vaishnava.

kaivalyake narka mAne svargake khapuSpa jAne
indriya kRSNa sevane vizva-pUrNa sukhe
daivatAdi nAhi gaNe tomAra kRponmukhe
tomAra-i audArya vIrya AtmA akaitava
tomAra kRpA mUrtimanta gauDIya vaiSNava

He takes nondualistic liberation to be hell
and heaven to be a flower in the sky;
his senses are all engaged in Krishna's service
and so he sees the world as a place of joy;
he pays no attention to other gods,
turned only toward the search for Your mercy;

He is filled with the heroism of Your munificence;
his heart is without deception;
the incarnation of Your blessings --
that is the Gaudiya Vaishnava.

saMsAre se anAsakta bAhya dehe sAdhaka bhakta
antare se anurakta rAgAnugA lobhe
gaurotsave vrajera bhAve sadA iSTa seve
keza-zeSa-sudurlabha gopIra anubhava
acintya prabhAvI se gauDIya vaiSNava

Though detached from the world;
externally, he carries on like a sadhaka bhakta;
yet within he seethes with rAgAnugA greed.
Festive in the mood of Gauranga
he always serves the object of his love:
the mood of the gopis,
so rare for even Brahma, Vishnu and Ananta.

Incomprehensible in his divine power,
that is the Gaudiya Vaishnava.
Talasiga - Fri, 13 Aug 2004 05:18:16 +0530
Edited 19 Aug 2004 with
QUOTE (Madhava)
I would like to say, and I honestly mean it, that there is something fundamentally screwed up if people spend more time complaining and delving on themselves than they spend in making truly positive contributions that they feel will be fulfilling to the entire audience, not only to themselves.

an excerpt from the last post in this Moderation and Feedback topic


As you please.
Talasiga - Fri, 13 Aug 2004 06:01:48 +0530
QUOTE (Jagat @ Aug 12 2004, 04:28 PM)
Seems a trivial consideration on which to hinge one's acceptance or rejection of anything. Clearly a veiled criticism of those who do proclaim to be Gaudiya Vaishnavas--but a shallow one, indeed.

.......

Jagat, theologising Raadha as Krishna's Shakti (internal or otherwise)
is no trivial thing. But this is not a topic to discuss that. Its a topic about me
in which I simply wish to put on record that Raadha's theological status has little relevance to my spirituality as I am aware of it.

The ancients who tended their fields and worshipped the sun -
was their love and service diminished because they thought it was the sun
that travelled through the sky and not the earth that orbited the sun?
Jagat - Fri, 13 Aug 2004 06:37:06 +0530
And yet, if there was not a river to be crossed,
no boat, no ferryman, no Radha on the other side,
no Gauranga and his gang of merry men
and manjaris, who made this dream concrete,
would you be making these solar speculations?
That's my point--you've sold your elephant, my friend,
and now you quibble, calling it a pachyderm.
Being you is not as great as being Gaura Das.
Talasiga - Fri, 13 Aug 2004 06:56:42 +0530
QUOTE (Jagat @ Aug 13 2004, 01:07 AM)
And yet, if there was not a river to be crossed,
no boat, no ferryman, no Radha on the other side,
no Gauranga and his gang of merry men
and manjaris, who made this dream concrete,
would you be making these solar speculations?
That's my point--you've sold your elephant, my friend,
and now you quibble, calling it a pachyderm.
........

There is a river, a boat,
friends in strange passengers,
a ferryman and one in white waiting by the shore.
To theologize them involves speculation
but to feel them is to know them, and
to write or sing of them is to realise
their inexhaustible relevance.

Jagat - Fri, 13 Aug 2004 07:15:23 +0530
Perhaps we talk of diff'rent things.
I too say, "Don't think, feel!"
But your brain-twisting Gaudiya
Is made of straw, not real.

Gora says prema prayojan
And is that not your goal?
Then why you won't accept the name
and make the circle whole?

A weary fight it is, my friend,
to show strength--we are weak.
And to admit that we belong
Won't make us less unique.
Talasiga - Fri, 13 Aug 2004 08:17:18 +0530
QUOTE (Jagat @ Aug 13 2004, 01:45 AM)
Perhaps we talk of diff'rent things.
I too say, "Don't think, feel!"
But your brain-twisting Gaudiya
Is made of straw, not real.

........

Of course to theologise may be to sing
But to make an edict of a song is not a feeling thing
Jagat - Fri, 13 Aug 2004 08:39:51 +0530
And with this thought I will agree,
but say just this, that such as he
has Gaura's name, but not his soul:
He's kicked the ball, but missed the goal.

But from that farce you judge the game?
Excuse me but your logic's lame.
Jagat - Fri, 13 Aug 2004 08:52:33 +0530
But, of course, it does matter what Radha is. I can understand not wanting to get caught up in arcane battles of the angels on pins variety. But Radha is important. She is what Gaura gives, and she is what gives Gaura meaning. She is the soul of Gaudiya Vaishnavism, so it is true that we have to have some idea of what she is.

But like I said, it's definitely an emotional thing. No one is going to change your experience, and if your experience of Gaudiya Vaishnavas is that they are pompous fundamentalists throwing scripture darts at each other, or engaging in other mundane pastimes, then there is little I can do to change that, except pray that the Gaudiya Vaishnavas of this world really get Gaura's mercy and pass it on...

jijaji - Fri, 13 Aug 2004 08:56:09 +0530
Talasiga,

Just curious and this is off track, I apologize...

but this is "Questions about Talasiga" so I thought it would be ok..

but I was wondering..

I know you left iskcon many many years ago...did you afterwards ever met any other Gaudiya Vaishnavas outside iskcon/GM in India?

And did you ever make it to Braja and the Holy places in Braja like Radha Kunda or Govardhana?

bangli
Talasiga - Fri, 13 Aug 2004 09:18:26 +0530
QUOTE (Jagat @ Aug 13 2004, 03:22 AM)
But, of course, it does matter what Radha is. I can understand not wanting to get caught up in arcane battles of the angels on pins variety. But Radha is important. She is what Gaura gives, and she is what gives Gaura meaning. She is the soul of Gaudiya Vaishnavism, so it is true that we have to have some idea of what she is.

I am not rejecting the salience of Raadha.
I take it that all here accept her reality and relevance
at some experiential level, noting that even an experience of a concept
is still an experience.

It is neither critical to know "what" Raadha is, nor critical to avoid it.
It is critical that I know that I have received,
to know this in my heart,
and to serve its flowering
with the nourishment of keertan.


Talasiga - Fri, 13 Aug 2004 09:41:19 +0530
QUOTE (bangli @ Aug 13 2004, 03:26 AM)
......

I know you left iskcon many many years ago...did you afterwards ever met any other Gaudiya Vaishnavas outside iskcon/GM in India?

........

I do not know if the Vaishnavas I met in India were Gaudiyas or not.
I remember one elderly Vaishnava Baba (long top knotted hair and tilak)
leading a troupe of devotees in Rishikesh looked towards me in a crowd
and gently, ever so gently, greeted me.

Such a modest transaction and yet so moving even now after almost 20 years have passed. His devotees also looked to me as if they knew me. Yet I was a stranger and yet I felt at home.

I have met you too and there is something about you of that ilk.
If only the whole of you could be absorbed in that ilk
your life would be holy.
Talasiga - Fri, 13 Aug 2004 09:51:16 +0530
Edited 19 Aug 2004 with
QUOTE (Madhava)
I would like to say, and I honestly mean it, that there is something fundamentally screwed up if people spend more time complaining and delving on themselves than they spend in making truly positive contributions that they feel will be fulfilling to the entire audience, not only to themselves.

an excerpt from the last post in this Moderation and Feedback topic


Okay then.
Jagat - Fri, 13 Aug 2004 09:53:10 +0530
Perhaps you're right, we Gaudiyas
put too much stress on identity.
We like concrete ideas and forms
and dislike vague poetic fantasy.
We like our gods with bones and flesh
flesh of lila, siddhanta bones,
not too many metaphoric undertones
threat'ning to turn them into ghosts.

Of course, my Krishna is a metaphor,
but that's just one frame--he is much more.
More than amorphous sat or chit,
He's anand, and that means solid.
jijaji - Fri, 13 Aug 2004 09:56:31 +0530
Please all of you forgive my offences and allow me to serve the Vaishnavas and keep the name of Radha on my tongue...

I can be a real wiseass I know..

bangli
Jagat - Fri, 13 Aug 2004 09:59:56 +0530
Maybe metaphor is the blood that streams
through the lila's veins, the stuff of dreams.
Talasiga - Fri, 13 Aug 2004 10:10:58 +0530
QUOTE (Jagat @ Aug 13 2004, 04:23 AM)
Perhaps you're right, we Gaudiyas
put too much stress on identity.
.......

The stress on identity is redundant
We can't merge with Krishna
Talasiga - Fri, 13 Aug 2004 10:22:30 +0530
QUOTE (Jagat @ Aug 13 2004, 04:29 AM)
Maybe metaphor is the blood that streams
through the lila's veins, the stuff of dreams.


I write captions for what I see. If you cannot see what I see
my poems will be metaphorical.

When you too write captions for what you see
we may have devotional sangha
even though we may see different visions
and write differently about them.
Dhyana - Sun, 15 Aug 2004 22:32:16 +0530
QUOTE
Of course to theologise may be to sing
But to make an edict of a song is no feeling thing


This is how I feel about the Bhagavatam. It's a song. It is not perfectly logically coherent. It is not homogenous. It leaves loose ends here and there, contradicts itself here and there, is cryptic, yet also undescribably moving. It moves the heart, stops one's breath, and one doesn't even understand why.

Then come the commentators who have not just their love for the Bhagavatam but also a theology to write and a doctrine to enunciate... and other doctrines to refute. Acaryas who need to prove their institutions, too, have their own commentary on the Vedanta. Acaryas who need to defend the arguments of their predecessor acaryas.

It's hard to be critical of them. Much of what they write is necessary, for some of the more cryptic passages would be just lost on an average reader. Much of what they write, sharing their own inner vision, is just as heady as the Bhagavatam itself.

But still... it's like, too many words. Drives away the ambiguity. The silences. The suspense. The fuzzy contours that allow one to dream.

It makes the Bhagavatam into an encyclopaedia, which it never claimed to be (...or wait, did it?). It makes it into an institution. It spoils it, for me.

I discovered long ago that the verses in the Bhagavatam that move me the most are the verses with almost no commentary and no philosophical point. They have just the emotion. At first I was irritated at my misplaced attraction. But maybe it's because these verses are "unspoiled", they have no strings attached. They just are.

Dhyana
Jagat - Sun, 15 Aug 2004 23:45:20 +0530
pibata bhAgavataM rasam Alayam
muhur aho rasikA bhuvi bhAvukAH
Talasiga - Mon, 16 Aug 2004 07:11:16 +0530
QUOTE (Dhyana @ Aug 15 2004, 05:02 PM)
This is how I feel about the Bhagavatam. It's a song. It is not perfectly logically coherent. It is not homogenous. It leaves loose ends here and there, contradicts itself here and there, is cryptic, yet also undescribably moving. It moves the heart, stops one's breath, and one doesn't even understand why.

Then come the commentators who have not just their love for the Bhagavatam but also a theology to write and a doctrine to enunciate... and other doctrines to refute. Acaryas who need to prove their institutions, too, have their own commentary on the Vedanta. Acaryas who need to defend the arguments of their predecessor acaryas.

It's hard to be critical of them. Much of what they write is necessary, for some of the more cryptic passages would be just lost on an average reader. Much of what they write, sharing their own inner vision, is just as heady as the Bhagavatam itself.

But still... it's like, too many words. Drives away the ambiguity. The silences. The suspense. The fuzzy contours that allow one to dream.

It makes the Bhagavatam into an encyclopaedia, which it never claimed to be (...or wait, did it?). It makes it into an institution. It spoils it, for me.

I discovered long ago that the verses in the Bhagavatam that move me the most are the verses with almost no commentary and no philosophical point. They have just the emotion. At first I was irritated at my misplaced attraction. But maybe it's because these verses are "unspoiled", they have no strings attached. They just are.

Dhyana

Thank You Dhyana for this confession.
I am like minded. You have written well also.
I look forward to some difference in opinion with you
in the future for the pleasure of well written engagements.

Vraja is replete with ambiguous lines.
So Chitra Sakhi is feted in the circle of Gopis.

Chitra Sakhi ki Jay smile.gif
Dhyana - Mon, 16 Aug 2004 21:40:05 +0530
Thank you, Talasiga, for your appreciation expressed in this unusual way. For my part, I look forward to many more inspiring texts from you.

QUOTE
Vraja is replete with ambiguous lines.


...must be, since Krsna likes paroksha-vada, as He has said Himself in the 11th Canto Bhagavatam. rolleyes.gif

Dhyana

Talasiga - Wed, 18 Aug 2004 09:00:12 +0530
bangli asking me this in another topic
QUOTE
Talasiga..

got a question for ya bro..

where did you get that term 'personist'.....?

isn't that an old worn out iskcon term used only in that small corner of existence..?

I am sorry but it buggs me...

call me a sahajiya I don't mind..in fact it gives me goosebumps..!

.....


I think you mean "personalist". If you studied art you would know that Cubists attempt to depict their perception of the true through cubes and other geometrical shapes; the Impressionists - through fleeting effects or impressions of light and the Minimalist challenges the viewer's gestalten. Personalists also are a particular school of artists. If you like, we can call the school the yAdvAd. Jaya Shri Radhe may be able to explain this to you.
jijaji - Wed, 18 Aug 2004 09:15:18 +0530
I humbly bow to your feet talasiga and beg u to forgive for any offense I have made to you...
please I know secretly you are special to Radha Krishna and playing a game with us all here..

Please just ask them to consider forgiving such an offensive person as me..

Radhe Radhe,

bangli

Talasiga - Wed, 18 Aug 2004 14:53:46 +0530
QUOTE (bangli @ Aug 18 2004, 03:45 AM)
I humbly bow to your feet talasiga and beg u to forgive for any offense I have made to you...
please I know secretly you are special to Radha Krishna and playing a game with us all here..

Please just ask them to consider forgiving such an offensive person as me..


I am not aware of any offense you have caused me. Whatever it is you have done seek forgiveness from Kaalindee. Go to Braj. If you can convince one, even one, temple to instal compostable latrines and to plant reed beds between them and the River, then I am sure you will be forgiven.

The offence is by the Riverside. It is a collective offence. We are all part of that collective unless we act.
jijaji - Wed, 18 Aug 2004 15:37:58 +0530
user posted image
Talasiga - Thu, 19 Aug 2004 18:58:18 +0530
QUOTE (Jagat @ Aug 19 2004, 12:14 PM)

It helps me to know that behind your complex posts lies a simple man in an Indo-Fijian body, of my own age, ecologizing in a sylvan Australian paysage. And to this I will add my image of you singing "om namaH zivAya" and "he Chitra Sakhi" to the accompaniment of your own tabla playing.

A mythic image, no doubt, but it smooths the edges on those raggedy posts.
an excerpt from this other topic


You were probably myth-informed by
Perumal's "poem" in this other topic

despite the fact that you and Madhava agree on this:-
QUOTE (Jagat)
Madhava and I agree on the following. We are irritated by [LIST]
................................
................................
................................
[*]Posts that have not been carefully reread by the writer. There is an EDIT icon. People should read their posts and do their best .........................................
Jagat - Thu, 19 Aug 2004 19:28:44 +0530
So you don't chant "om namah sivaya"? Or you don't play the tabla? Or you don't call out to Chitra Sakhi? As I recall, you denied the identity, not the spelling. I left it in because of the pun, but it stands as "nor will", but now it seems the problem is the spelling. At any rate, I am not in favor of "outing" personal information without the approval of the individual in question, unless there is good reason for doing so. So I have changed it. My apologies.
Talasiga - Thu, 19 Aug 2004 20:24:01 +0530
QUOTE (Jagat @ Aug 19 2004, 01:58 PM)
So you don't chant "om namah sivaya"? Or you don't play the tabla? Or you don't call out to Chitra Sakhi? ......

1. Most of my kirtan is about the Gopis and Krishna and falling leaves.
2. I rarely play tabla these days. I find it challenging play tabla and sing at the same time. If I sing with drum, the drum I play will be a Duff. I tend to sing more with harmonium these days and this informs my flute playing.
3. I have not yet sung the particular name of any gopi other than Raadhaa.
4. I do not smoke marihuana or anything else and I never have.
5. I accept Shiva as a pure devotee and the protector of Braj and I am happy to be stoned for this ......


Jay Guru Shiva Hara Guru Aum!
Jagat - Thu, 19 Aug 2004 20:38:55 +0530
Thank you for the clarification. Image adjusted.
Talasiga - Thu, 19 Aug 2004 21:04:45 +0530
QUOTE (Jagat @ Aug 19, 2004, 02:29 PM)

In this now locked Moderation and Feedback topic

Why don't you stop focus on you and discuss something about Gaudiya Siddhanta or Sanatan Dharma...?


You and others have a choice. You can join me in any of the following topics (just to name recent five of many) which would meet your approval, I am sure:-

1. proposing an exegesis regarding the oneness and distinctness of Shiva and Narayan

2. the vernacular and jargon of sahajiya

3. on the poetics of the small and the great

4. on the treasure of being lost and found

5. on the scansion of Indic poetry


Image readjusted.




Talasiga - Fri, 20 Aug 2004 05:54:14 +0530
QUOTE (Madhava)
I would like to say, and I honestly mean it, that there is something fundamentally screwed up if people spend more time complaining and delving on themselves than they spend in making truly positive contributions that they feel will be fulfilling to the entire audience, not only to themselves.

an excerpt from the last post in this Moderation and Feedback topic


Thats strange Madhava, 25% of my posts as at this date are in the Philosophy and Theology Forum.

I withdraw the biography in my profile now.
Madhava - Fri, 20 Aug 2004 13:42:12 +0530
QUOTE (Talasiga @ Aug 20 2004, 02:24 AM)
I withdraw the biography in my profile now.

Please know that that is equivalent to no longer being a full member.
Talasiga - Fri, 20 Aug 2004 13:53:33 +0530
QUOTE (Madhava @ Aug 20 2004, 08:12 AM)
QUOTE (Talasiga @ Aug 20 2004, 02:24 AM)
I withdraw the  biography in my profile now.

Please know that that is equivalent to no longer being a full member.

In that case I would be most pleased if you could put this topic back in the Questions and Answers forum which is where I had started it. At least then, I will be able to respond to questions about me that may be asked. Thank You for your indulgence.

Kind Regards.
Madhava - Fri, 20 Aug 2004 14:00:25 +0530
The moderation & feedback subforum is also available for those who are not full members. You can post there. This topic does not belong under Q & A.
Talasiga - Fri, 20 Aug 2004 14:09:12 +0530
Thank you very much for your kindness. Also, thank you for not patronising me. I really mean that.

Also, when will my membership status be adjusted to show that I am no longer in the "Full Member" group? I want to be seen to be in the same group as Anand.

Best Wishes.
Madhava - Fri, 20 Aug 2004 14:17:47 +0530
There you go.
Anand - Fri, 20 Aug 2004 17:41:05 +0530
Welcome Talasiga.

LOCKED OUT

Squiggly margins, how vain.
Defective poetry, what absurd complaint.

Actually, in this vein,
I like for you to tuck in your tail,
Its sticking out of the /otherwise/
Perfectly aligned return lane.

Customer service is expedient.
Quantities almost unlimited.
Values always generic,
Taste? To see the connection I fail.

However, quality being somewhat bent,
In moderation we spend.
Jagat - Fri, 20 Aug 2004 18:15:38 +0530
saraswata.net is always appreciative of criticisms of Gaudiya Discussions. They will be very happy to hear about emperors with no clothes and what-not.

With regards "taste". Madhurya Kadambini discusses taste (ruchi) in the fifth chapter. Vishwanath talks about vastv-apekSiNI ruci and vastv-anapekSiNI ruci. One who is more advanced obviously does not care for the externals in devotional activities--if the quality of a singer or Bhagavata speaker is poor, he does not care so much, but feels ecstasy immediately. This is because he is approaching Asakti, where the attachment is not so much to the devotional activity, but to the object of devotion.

But for the lesser devotees, who form the great majority, the externals matter. And indeed, from the point of view of the devotee, they mean a great deal. Care in details of one's service is surely an important matter. If one is a singer, he should sing well, using and developing his talents for the pleasure of the Divine Couple. Similarly, one speaking on the Bhagavatam should work at improving his service to make it professional, so to speak, so that even those who are not already predisposed to hearing Krishna's glories find pleasure and inspiration in hearing them.

We hope that participants here will have a similar attitude towards their posting and dress them nicely. We ourselves try to be essence seekers and take the best of what everyone has to offer. That is why we feel that for a simple suggestion to take on this complexity is entirely out of proportion. And, in fact, out of sympathy with the purpose of this site.

You want taste? This is not the way to get it. So spend in moderation. I am spending too much time in moderation.
jijaji - Fri, 20 Aug 2004 18:35:59 +0530
Boy,
What is up with Talasiga these days? He cannot let go of all this tug-of-war for some damm reason, and I am getting a little bothered by it all. At first it was Jnani like mental wrestling fun with Tala, now it's become overboard!
Tala..what the hell is wrong? Let this tit for tat go man, just let it go!
Madhava and Jagat are way cool, you should stop and re-consider and stop gettin off on being a Kamakasi Aussie!
Please stay and just chill for a bit!

Peace to you my brother,

Pratap Bangli
(accept no imitation)
Anand - Fri, 20 Aug 2004 19:05:31 +0530
QUOTE
We ourselves try to be essence seekers and take the best of what everyone has to offer.


Clearly you cannot recognize the best, sometimes. Either that, or you must have had to make the difficult choice between gopi dust and gopi dot. In which case you automatically BECAME the rule.
Jagat - Fri, 20 Aug 2004 19:25:44 +0530
We have our ideals. Thank God there are people like you who hold us to account. We continue to hold those ideals, however poorly we may realize them. Our apologies to all for our imperfections.

As to the best, perhaps we do not recognize them. However, as far as we are concerned, the best will continue to shine forth despite obstacles. We are not there to place obstacles in the way of the "best," but if we do so accidentally, we trust in the noble Vaishnavas that they will be magnanimous and look to our intentions rather than to our failures; and that rather than trying to disrupt our efforts will try to help us in realizing what is most noble in ourselves.

In that view, we bow down to all the Vaishnavas and ask for their forgiveness and mercy.

Om Shanti.
Anand - Fri, 20 Aug 2004 19:30:03 +0530
There is no shelter in shanti. Your ideal is catching up on you.
Jagat - Fri, 20 Aug 2004 20:09:37 +0530
Om Shanti means, "That's it. I have nothing more to say."
Talasiga - Sat, 21 Aug 2004 06:06:55 +0530
QUOTE (bangli @ Aug 20 2004, 01:05 PM)
Boy,
What is up with Talasiga these days? He cannot let go of all this tug-of-war for some damm reason, and I am getting a little bothered by it all. At first it was Jnani like mental wrestling fun with Tala, now it's become overboard!
Tala..what the hell is wrong? Let this tit for tat go man, just let it go!
Madhava and Jagat are way cool, you should stop and re-consider and stop gettin off on being a Kamakasi Aussie!
Please stay and just chill for a bit!

Peace to you my brother,

Pratap Bangli
(accept no imitation)

The Oracle is confounded by these questions Bangli. Talasiga's recent posts in this topic have been thankful and gracious on several counts. The Oracle suggests not to doubt your intuition. What, however, must be rigourously examined is action that is conceived as a response to the intuition. Is the action a product of conditioning that may not honour the intuition? Such questions are worthy of your inimitable reflection.
jijaji - Sat, 21 Aug 2004 06:10:32 +0530
QUOTE (Talasiga @ Aug 21 2004, 12:36 AM)
QUOTE (bangli @ Aug 20 2004, 01:05 PM)
Boy,
What is up with Talasiga these days? He cannot let go of all this tug-of-war for some damm reason, and I am getting a little bothered by it all. At first it was Jnani like mental wrestling fun with Tala, now it's become overboard!
Tala..what the hell is wrong? Let this tit for tat go man, just let it go!
Madhava and Jagat are way cool, you should stop and re-consider and stop gettin off on being a Kamakasi Aussie!
Please stay and just chill for a bit!

Peace to you my brother,

Pratap Bangli
(accept no imitation)

The Oracle is confounded by these questions Bangli. Talasiga's recent posts in this topic have been thankful and gracious on several counts. The Oracle suggests not to doubt your intuition. What, however, must be rigourously examined is action that is conceived as a response to the intuition. Is the action a product of conditioning that may not honour the intuition? Such questions are worthy of your inimitable reflection.

ok,

but how are you doin...you ok man?

huh.gif
jijaji - Sat, 21 Aug 2004 12:31:54 +0530
tala baba:
The Oracle suggests not to doubt your intuition.

bangli mahesh yogi:

user posted image
jijaji - Sat, 21 Aug 2004 21:54:02 +0530
Oh .. Confounded Oracle,

Were the Jnana-like tactics you used here only a Trojan Horse, that allowed you a means to convey something more occult ?

cool.gif
Talasiga - Mon, 23 Aug 2004 17:36:07 +0530
QUOTE (bangli @ Aug 21 2004, 04:24 PM)
Oh .. Confounded Oracle,

Were the Jnana-like tactics you used here only a Trojan Horse, that allowed you a means to convey something more occult ?

cool.gif

It is suggested that the "Jnana-like tactics " are in your head, Fred .......
jijaji - Mon, 23 Aug 2004 18:24:04 +0530
Good Morning Confounded Oracle,

user posted image
Talasiga - Tue, 24 Aug 2004 06:42:13 +0530
Ah Good Morning Bangli Ji. Do you have any questions for me today?
Do you do daily kirtan? Do you have any questions about raagas ?
Did you know that every raaga is a pure devotee? A lot of them are Gopis.

Chitra Sakhi ki Jay!
jijaji - Tue, 24 Aug 2004 08:00:10 +0530
Talasiga,

No questions for you today, sorry not interested in playing with you anymore...

user posted image
Talasiga - Tue, 24 Aug 2004 08:58:44 +0530
QUOTE (bangli @ Aug 24 2004, 02:30 AM)
Talasiga,

No questions for you today, sorry not interested in playing with you anymore...

user posted image

What?! OK, OK don't go - lets play one of your games then. Ahhh, let me see now ............

Oh yeah, what about the one where I pretend you have offended me and then I HAVE to forgive you. smile.gif

Would you like to play that game? Yes, that could be a good one. Yes, I could pretend that you have offended me by following me around in different topics accusing me of playing games. This would be a challenging game because I would have to forgive you for this.
biggrin.gif
Kalkidas - Tue, 24 Aug 2004 10:19:53 +0530
QUOTE (Talasiga @ Aug 24 2004, 01:12 AM)
Did you know that every raaga is a pure devotee?  A lot of them are Gopis.

Chitra Sakhi ki Jay!

darApi na dRg-arpitA sakhi zikhaNDa-cUDe mayA
prasIda bata mA kRthA mayi vRthA purobhAgitAm |
naTan-makara-kuNDalaM sapadi caNDi lIlA-gatiM
tanoty ayam adUrataH
kim iha saMvidheyaM mayA ||

Chitra Sakhi ki Jay!

Please give translations and references, Kalkiji. Only a few people here are Sanskrit scholars. And thank you for uplifiting this thread. (Jagat) biggrin.gif
Talasiga - Wed, 25 Aug 2004 16:08:54 +0530
Kalkiji you have posted this in response to my comment abour raagas and Gopis. As Jagat said a translation would be good. Also, could you also source it please.

Thank You.
Kalkidas - Wed, 25 Aug 2004 18:41:58 +0530
QUOTE (Talasiga @ Aug 25 2004, 10:38 AM)
Kalkiji you have posted this in response to my comment abour raagas and Gopis.  As Jagat said a translation would be good.  Also, could you also source it please.

Thank You.

Dear Talasigaji,

Source is Ujjvala-nilamani 8.20. Sripad Dhyanachandra Goswami cites this verse in his Paddhati while describing Chitra Sakhi:

adhika-mRdvy-udAharaNaM, yathA (UN 8.20) --

darApi na dRg-arpitA sakhi zikhaNDa-cUDe mayA
prasIda bata mA kRthA mayi vRthA purobhAgitAm |
naTan-makara-kuNDalaM sapadi caNDi lIlA-gatiM
tanoty ayam adUrataH kim iha saMvidheyaM mayA || 233 ||


An example of adhika-mRdvI: ZrI CitrA said to her priya-sakhI, “O SakhI! You’ll be pleased to know that I don’t even cast a slight glance at KRSNa. There’s no need to be jealous of me. But O CaNDi! When He approaches me to increase His lIlA, with His dolphin-shaped earrings dancing, what am I supposed to do?”
(translation by Haricaranaji)

Dear Jagatji,

Sorry, if I made unnecessary reply. Something in Chitra Sakhi and especially this verse describing her mood, touches me deeply inside, so I couldn't withstand temptation of citing it... blush.gif